The wrath of God was satisfied!

August 6, 2013 § 9 Comments

Whenever I have the privilege of introducing myself as a Presbyterian pastor, more often than not it is usually with the caveat that I am pastor in “the other Presbyterian church.”

That, of course, is not strictly true, because there are several Presbyterian denominations in America:  the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America, the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, the Bible Presbyterian Church and, my own denomination, the Presbyterian Church in America.  There are, of course, still others not listed here, but what is significant is that most of these denominations (the venerable and historic ARP and RPCNA notably excepted) came into being because of the deadening grip of liberal, progressive theology in the two historic mainline Presbyterian denominations, the PCUSA (historically a Northern Church) and the PCUS (a Southern Church); the two joined as one national denomination in the 1980s as the PCUSA.

Though there are individual PCUSA congregations that are theologically conservative, at the General Assembly level this denomination essentially denies the evangelical and Reformed distinctives that have historically defined the Presbyterian Church:  the verbal inspiration, inerrancy and authority of Scripture; the virgin birth, deity of and bodily resurrection of Christ; and the truth that faith “in Christ alone” is the one way of sinners to God (see John 14:6).

In light of these things, the recent rejection in the PCUSA of the Townend-Getty hymn “In Christ Alone” because of the words  “till on that cross as Jesus died/the wrath of God was satisfied” is not only no surprise, it is completely understandable.  Once one denies the Bible truly and authoritatively is God’s word, all that is left is human spin.  You don’t like the wrath of God?  That’s okay—in our modern enlightened state we “understand” that the writers of the New Testament had a hard time shaking the primitive, patriarchal view of God that their forbears possessed.  Today we “know” that God is kinder and gentler—pure love.

It was just this kind of denial of biblical theological truth that ultimately led thousands of Bible-believing Presbyterians in 1973 to leave the then-PCUS to form the Presbyterian Church in America.  The congregation I am privileged to serve as Pastor, McIlwain Memorial Presbyterian Church, was a leading congregation in this national movement; one of our congregants, the honorably retired evangelist-missionary Rev. Arnie Maves, boasts the honor of being the very first man to be defrocked by the Florida Presbytery (PCUS) for engaging in activity that led to the formation of what would become the first Presbytery of a denomination that had the audacity to believe the Bible was really the holy and inerrant Word of God.  J. Gresham Machen would have been proud.

Biblically speaking, though, the love of God is actually defined by the reality of the wrath of God.

From the Bible’s perspective, the reality of God’s wrath toward sin could not be clearer.  That wrath arises from God’s moral and ethical perfection—that is, he is both good and just.  Both of these attributes are in fact what establish God’s wrath as the good and just response against evil.  Indeed, apart from the reality of the perfect wrath of a holy and just God we have no confidence that evil will be judged as evil.

But what is extraordinary about the biblical doctrine of the wrath of God is that it is always put alongside the love of God:

…but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since, therefore, we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God. For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life.  (Romans 5:6-10, ESV; emphasis added)

We will never appreciate the love of God until we have had a personal face-off with the wrath of God.  Simply put, the Bible teaches that all have sinned and fall short of God’s standard (see Romans 3:23).  What this means is that, by the nature of that reality, we are liable to the just punishment that sinners deserve, which is God’s wrath.

Because God is morally and ethically perfect—good and just—he must show his wrath against sin, which assaults goodness and justice.  Indeed, if he God doesn’t pour out his wrath on sin he is neither good nor just!

It is precisely at this point that the awesome love of God comes into magnificent focus.  Romans 3 tells us that this very God, who is filled with just wrath toward sin, is the same God who himself presented Jesus, who was and remains God incarnate, “as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith…”(Romans 3:25).  The word “propitiation” is the key:  it directly refers to the satisfaction of wrath.

The point is this:  God’s love is manifested in the fact that God was most definitely “not fair” toward sinners! Instead of giving us what we deserve—his just wrath—he gave us what we didn’t deserve:  grace!  What is more, God himself, in the second person of the Trinity, is the very One who satisfied that wrath.  That is the epitome of love—that he “loved me and gave himself for me” (Galatians 2:20) so that I might escape what I deserve and instead be redeemed to glorify God and enjoy him forever!

What is sad about the “In Christ Alone” controversy in the PCUSA is that, in rejecting the biblical truth of the wrath of God, the leaders of that denomination have completely erased any context for defining how the cross could possibly magnify God’s love, as they suggested the words be altered to say.  What was Jesus dying for if the cross was not the place where God displayed his wrath against sin?  What in fact is sin if it is not the moral assault of God’s holy character and commands?  More than that, why did Jesus even come?   Yet all of this begs the question:  the liberal, progressive theology the PCUSA has endorsed already denies the real fall of Adam that cast us into sin and rejects that Jesus is in fact God incarnate who died for sinners and was physically raised from the dead—so it really can’t affirm the wrath of God because there is no need for such personal redemption in the first place.

That is a lie from one place:  the pit of Hell.

So, this Sunday at McIlwain Presbyterian Church we will be singing “In Christ Alone”—just as we have done many times before—as we celebrate that the love of God, where “the wrath of God was satisfied.”

That is indeed how the love of God is magnified.


Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

§ 9 Responses to The wrath of God was satisfied!

  • Lori Fullerton says:

    Amen! And just as another God-thing…as I was reading the post and listening to my Pandora account, “In Christ Alone” began playing. Go God!

  • really excellent response, Rob.

  • Jerry Hattaway says:

    Thank you Rob! AMEN Please continue preaching GOD’s Holy Word from our pulpit. As McIlwain’s historian I remember well the years of the 1970’s and the things of which you speak.
    Jerry Hattaway

  • Shawn Keating says:

    This incident inspired my sermon Sunday at Fairfield too!

  • Kayren says:

    Excellent expository writing. Sole Deo Gloria!

  • Brent McMahan says:

    Praise God for preachers who are not afraid to teach the Gospel. Thank you, Rob.

  • Johnathan Oaks says:

    Amen! Solo Deo Gloria.

  • Michael says:

    Pastor Looper, Is the Presbyterian church in a tug-of-war within the long-lasting rift in Christianity from the nation’s beginning between liberal Unitarianism theology and thought pitted against the traditional, conservative Evangelical school of thought? In our nation’s beginning, Puritan theology and practice was conservative and traditional. In New England, the Unitarian liberal thought tended to grow among New England business owners who traveled the world to other religions and did business with non-Christian businesses in other countries. The divide between liberal Unitarianism versus conservative Calvinism belief resulted in theological divides between the states: New England being mostly liberal Unitarian in belief versus traditional Calvinist belief that was predominate throughout the South. Today we continue to see New England dominated politically with liberal ideology and Unitarian beliefs versus the South whereby traditional conservative values are usually preserved, but today are being more and more challenged by liberal theology.

    • Rob says:

      Thanks for your comment/question, Michael. I would say Presbyterianism in general has been impacted by the rift you mention. Because we are sinners, left to ourselves, we always tend toward spiritual entropy, so to speak. This is true corporately as well as individually; unless the church intentionally submits itself to God’s intervention in its life via his holy Word (Heb. 4:12) it inevitably moves toward theological liberalism. This has been and remains true in every denomination. As soon as the Bible loses its primary place as the sole authority, the slide into liberalism begins. Some such churches will hold to a form of traditionalism–but without a firm, authoritative foundation for why they do what they do, they ultimately become secular relativists with a religious veneer. Essentially, most modern liberal protestants are functional unitarians and universalists because they have neither a biblical understanding of the Trinity nor see a need for personal salvation from sin.

      This slide has been slower in the south, to be sure; the northeast is a veritable wasteland with regard to its evangelical and Puritan heritage.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading The wrath of God was satisfied! at Roblog.


%d bloggers like this: